Opinion 
 Blogs 
 National Comment 
 All children need is to know that they are loved. 

All children need is to know that they are loved.

It's really quite simple. Parent as if you were a grandparent, writes Catherine Deveny.

ALL children need is to know that they are loved. That simple sentence has been the most poignant thing anyone has said to me for a long, long time. He's right, this bloke. And he'd know. He was a broken-hearted little boy and he is now a beautiful father.

Repeat after me. All children need is to know that they are loved. Say it every day, have it tattooed on your forehead and write it in the sky. All children need is to know that they are loved.

I was reminded of this as I read a story about a Family Court judge in New Zealand who ruled that a girl named Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii could change her name. Her parents actually named her Talula Does The Hula From Hawaii. The judge then cited examples of children named Midnight Chardonnay, Number 16 Bus Shelter, Violence and twins called Benson and Hedges. Funny? Sure. A bit off topic? Absolutely. But it reminded me yet again that children do not need unusual names to make them special.

They are special. And all they need to know is that they are loved.

Kids don't need an en suite, computer games, jumping castles, ukulele lessons, bandanas, ironed clothes, matching socks, fancy private schools, trophies, in-ground pools, electric toothbrushes and rooms full of toys.

They don't need to have a bath every day. They don't need their own room. It's OK if they sleep in their clothes and have Weet-Bix for dinner in front of the telly every now and then. Lollies, plastic junk that gets broken underfoot, fancy renovations, junk food and outsourcing parenting are not good ways to love them. Loving them is the only way to love them.

It won't spoil them. It won't make them greedy. Loving them will teach them there's enough to go round and there's no need to be stingy. Loving children will teach them to love. Withholding love will teach them to withhold.

When I had my first child, I asked people what they did with their second child. There were a lot of uptight first children around and second and subsequent children generally seemed more relaxed. People said things such as happy parents equals happy baby, follow the child and don't muck about with cloth nappies, just go the disposables. I thought to myself, I'm not going to treat this baby like he's an only child. I'm going to treat him as if he's got four brothers and sisters.

When my eldest was four days old, he wouldn't stop crying. People were getting more and more anxious about trying to stop him crying. Pacing up and down the hall, patting, jiggling. The cries got louder and louder. I was lying on the bed and said: "Give him to me." I held him and said: "You just cry as long as you want." Calm descended. Instead of struggling with the reality (thanks to a few champagnes), I went with it. I used this technique many times and although it never stopped a baby from crying, a toddler from whinging, a child from nagging or a bunch of kids from squabbling, it stopped me from struggling with what was happening.

Around the age of 60, people seem to start looking back on their lives. Before then, they were too preoccupied living it. My new theory on parenting is to parent like a grandparent. All the grandparents I know look back on their parenting days and tell me they wish they'd been more relaxed and less controlling. They wish they'd enjoyed it more. Sure, get the homework done, teach them to be kind to each other, to help out and to wait their turn. It just means not going into conniptions when they leave their wet towels on the bathroom floor. It means stopping what you're doing to give them a cuddle on the couch, tell them a story or lie together on the trampoline looking at the clouds. Just for a moment.

The wisest bloke I know is a cabinetmaker. He's 60 in January and has spent 45 years going into homes installing wardrobes, drawers and bookshelves to help people store their stuff. His wife's a psychologist. The two of them have spent a great deal of time in other peoples lives and under their roofs. He told me they've come to the conclusion, with their vast and varied experience, that the only thing you can do for your kids is to get your own stuff together.

When you were a kid isn't that all you wanted? To know that you were loved and to feel that your parents were trying, and sometimes failing, but at least trying to get their stuff together? Is it possible that it really is that simple?

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
i couldnt agree more i am a grandmother of 6 mother to three my youngest is the only one teaching old fashioned values to her son. the oldest two buy there children and always promise to do things and never go through with them breaking childrens hearts everyday. you are right parent as if you are a grandparent at least we know how to love not to only think of our selves like most young parents i know.
Posted by ninny nanny on 1/08/2008 3:34:18 PM
Does 'all' refer to all children in the world; or does the all simply mean that everything that a child needs to know could be encapsulated in the notion that it is loved. . Who could say; a parent, the government? Cheers. from, R.
Posted by RebeccaOfSunnyBrookFarm on 1/08/2008 11:06:10 PM
Amazing articlel, as a preschool teacher, I meet a lot of families and they all love their kids but it is obvious which parents show it and which ones try to buy it. Keep writing!!
Posted by Kathyswi on 2/08/2008 7:54:28 AM
Catherine Deveny's observations are spot on! The greatest gift we can give our children is to devote our time to demonstrate our love, patience, acceptance and understanding. Overindulging a child with material objects simply doesn't satisfy his or her basic need for love and comfort. If anything, material objects are a poor substitute for our taking the time to create a warm and caring environment. After all, instant gratification only tends to promote long-term discontent. Our children are unique and special and they should be handled with great care and respect.
Posted by Marie Jacqueline Lee on 2/08/2008 2:00:19 PM
Catherine, you are so right. It is that simple. So why do we get sucked into to Fisher Price philosophy of fast tracking our children into material heaven instead of accepting them as they are, with their own gifts, talents and calling.
Posted by Angel Song on 2/08/2008 2:25:48 PM
It really is that simple !! Having an 18 year gap between our first and last child has been the biggest learning curve for our whole family. The youngest was telling the eldest that he did not agree with a decision that we had made, expecting some moral support , our eldest instead said " mum and dad are doing the best they can, they are really great parents and we are lucky to have them as our mum and dad". We have been blessed with four fantastic kids who are now adults , and our best friends.
Posted by chez on 3/08/2008 8:56:36 AM
I totally agree and yes it really is that simple....trouble is theres not too many people who are trying to get it together these days. I work with families every day and notice that many parents are damaged themselves and have no real structure in their lives. Kids don't have stability with parents living together etc...or parents are so busy working trying to pay the mortgage(s) or credit cards, the kids come second...not all but alot! Hug them all the time and tell them they're great. Even with the little things they do. Make them feel needed and as you said LOVED....all the time. And when we stuff up, as we do, say sorry to them and mean it.
Posted by Lisa on 4/08/2008 7:33:28 AM
I could not agree more... I often say to new mums when they express their fears about how they can be a good parent...love them and feed them it is that simple. Never be afraid to say I love you or I am sorry.
Posted by joanne26 on 5/08/2008 11:12:42 AM
I almost felt warm and fuzzy from reading that article.. That's a rather simplistic view Catherine. If all we need to do is love them, my question would be, what is love? Where does morals, virtues, and boundaries fit into this? Does that mean the next time I see an obese 8 year old eating take away food at a supermarket with their grandparents, I should rightly assume that kind of love is the way to go? I think you've done well in pointing out that materialism and pointless goals and standards are irrelevant and distracting to young minds, but to be a grandparent you first have to be a parent..
Posted by j on 5/08/2008 12:35:23 PM
True 'J' it is important to be a parent first demonstrating loving discipline ..but at the same time parents also have to show "self discipline" and model loving behaviour towards each other or in the event of perhaps a single parent family "self discipline" of themself. In deeds and words. But in saying all of that the love should be there in words and actions. Loving a child means you set boundaries and be prepared to apply them where necessary.
Posted by joanne26 on 5/08/2008 5:32:01 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
National Comment
Here is the place for you to vent on any national or world news and lifestyle stories on the YourGuide websites. If there is anything you see or hear that you like or don't like, tell us. Don't keep it to yourself!

22/09/2008 | Once upon a time finding a mate was easy. It was a childhood sweetheart, someone from church or if you were ugly, the other ugly person.
GameOn
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...